SHORTBUS. Brilliant, brilliant, brilliant. I loved it and highly recommend it.
An acquaintance made some comment after the movie about ass and cock and cum being vegan. She said, "Well, yeah, it is, because you don't swallow it! Unless you're filthy and disgusting!"
Um.
Or.
This sent my brain spinning and trying to actually define -- in words -- why all that nonsense is vegan (because I do think it's vegan, but not because, pardon my saying so, I don't swallow). Technically, they're "animal products," so, technically, there has to be some other differentiation between human-animal products and non-human-animal products.
The conclusion I came to is one of consent. An animal cannot consent to my taking its life, its milk, its skin, its feathers, etcetera. A human can consent to me taking (and, if I so choose, thank you very much, consuming) his or her bodily fluids, hair, etcetera. Would I consider a human-hair shirt vegan? Sure, if it came from a human that consented to its being made. Would the same shirt be vegan if it was made from the hair of a detainee, shaved against his or her will? I say no.
This got me thinking about animals as pets, of all things. I think this issue of consent is what may, from here on out, keep me from taking in any animals that, I feel, cannot display a consent to be confined/owned. A dog can choose to stay in the yard or not (though I would certainly not endanger one with traffic just to see if "it really loves me!")... a lizard in an aquarium or a hamster in a cage? Mm... notsomuch, methinks.
I'm sure this could all be fleshed out and dissertated and made elegant and convincing. It's late, though, and so I drag these snippets out and leave them lying in the middle of the floor. Look at how they don't move if I don't move them. Lazy things.
Tags: animals,
consent,
moving to la,
sex,
vegan Current Mood: 
relaxed